South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford is Latest Victim of His Own Politics

Last week it was Nevada Sen. John Ensign, this week it's South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford.
If they weren't so incredibly juicy, political sex scandals would be rather ho-hum by now. Whether it's a Democrat or a Republican, extra-marital affairs unfortunately seem rather commonplace in modern-day politics. Politicians from across the political spectrum seem to go astray, from local borough council members to sitting US presidents.
For obvious reasons, a political figure who runs on a platform of family values and then betrays those family values in the worst possible way is inviting not only criticism, but ridicule. There is little they can do but suffer the consequences of their actions. In Ensign's case, his affair with a campaign staffer was particularly heinous because he had been one of the many GOPers who 10 years earlier had called for President Bill Clinton's resignation in the wake of the Monica Lewinsky scandal.
In Sanford's case, he famously refused President Barack Obama's stimulus money (later compromising his position to pay down South Carolina's debt burden), because it was not in the taxpayers' best interests. Now, there are questions about whether he used taxpayer money to finance his trips to Argentina to visit his mistress. If true, allegations of merely being hypocritical will give way to allegations of being a criminal.
Republicans who run on a family values platform are -- and should be -- held to closer account than Democrats when scandals like these break. All too often, people expect this behavior from Democrats, so there isn't as much of a breach of trust when they are caught. Taxpayers are more tolerant than they should be, but they don't like to be lied to, and they can't stand to be stolen from.
The fact that both Ensign and Sanford are dyed-in-the-wool conservatives puts the conservative movement in a very difficult predicament, and further erodes the credibility of all conservatives. Clearly, their behavior is not in alignment with traditional family values, and since both were considered potential candidates for the 2012 presidential election many casual political observers will believe their behavior is representative of all conservatives.
It is not.
Ensign did the right thing by resigning. Sanford should follow suit. Regardless of things work out for him -- for good or ill -- he should practice what he's preached all his political life. Since this scandal will undoubtedly negate his ability to govern effectively, Sanford should realize it is in the public's best interests (and his own) for him to step down and deal with his personal problems privately.
Salvaging his 2012 presidential prospects should no longer be Sanford's top priority; salvaging his marriage should be. To do that, he'll need to be away from the public's prying eyes and away from the distractions of political life.
Photo © Davis Turner/Getty Images


Comments
You state, “All too often, people expect this behavior from Democrats, so there isn’t as much of a breach of trust when they are caught.” It’s not that it is “expected behavior” or that they are not held accountable for their actions by their party,(Spitzer was not treated lightly for his trangressions)it’s the fact that they are not being hypocrits, preaching some idea of family values to be followed by the masses but they themselves following rules of their own.
So the word of the day is, “HYPOCRACY”! That is what is just one of the major problems conservatives are facing today.
Here’s the thing, if you run as a republican, you are running on the “higher moral ground” promise, and when your in Sanford’s position who called for Clinton to resign, on and that republican (God forbid I remember his name) who got caught in the bathroom with another guy to resign, and then you commit adultery, you pretty much have to resign yourself, guess what he’s not doing. He has *nothing* of that moral background, that he ran on, “never taking a special interest dime” and “teaching our kids christian values.” Not only is he fried as far as pretty much any future in politics, but he’s also weakening the face of the already leaderless republican party. He *needs* to resign, because if he doesn’t, he is pained as a horrible, in-your-face hypocrite with no remorse. He can blow the whole sympathy mongering, “true love, I can die happy now, I’m sorry” (whilst simultaneously ignoring his wife at the same time) crap out his butt he wants, it isn’t going to help.
I admit Sanford is human, he will make mistakes like everyone else, but he also lied to everyone, he vanished, something you cannot do as the chief executive of a state. He lied to his security, and lied to his voters.